VideoProc

VidoeProc had no problems downloading YouTube video files that other programs could not download.

1. inability to adjust the font size or buttons (the font is too small for me, I have to strain my eyes);

2. absurd difference in the operation of the two modes - «Detailed» remastering, «Fast» remastering. The file was 22 minutes 14 seconds long and was processed in detail mode - 1 hour 3 minutes or 63 minutes. The same file was processed in «fast» mode for 1 hour 58 minutes or 118 minutes;

3. heavy load on the graphics card and processor. The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti averaged 90% performance at an average temperature of 66 degrees, while the Intel Core i7 processor averaged 30% performance at an average temperature of 86 degrees. For comparison, in other programs of a similar class, the videographic card worked at 80% at a temperature of 58 degrees, the processor at 25% at a temperature of 46 degrees, while strictly observing the same conditions for size, weight, duration, file format and PC cooling;

4. the disgusting quality of the remastering output file. Since last year, 2025, the quality of Topaz Video AI has dropped by two times - by 200%, but despite this deterioration, the program processed (improved) videography with a duration of 22 minutes 14 seconds on 200% better than VideoProc. Considering that the quality is still not perfect. Considering that there are two modes (Fast/Deep) Topaz Video AI processed the same videography much faster in time - 45 minutes and 1 hour 8 minutes, respectively. Moreover, Wondershare UniConverter, which does NOT remaster, but simply increases the resolution size of the videographic image, thanks to a more advanced AI module, processed a similar file better (in more detail, more clearly, more succinctly, more cleanly) than VideoProc.