Metapedia
Metapedia is an electronic encyclopedia which focuses on culture, art, science, philosophy and politics.
Platforms
- Online
According to WikiPedia and various user reports: “Metapedia is an online wiki-based encyclopedia, which contains fascist, far-right, white nationalist, white supremacist, anti-feminist, homophobic, Islamophobic, antisemitic, Holocaust-denying, and neo-Nazi points of view.”
Features
Metapedia News & Activities
Recent activities
- enolabyt liked Metapedia
"The chemtrail theory is often attacked by derisively calling it a "conspiracy theory". But because conspiracies do exist, a more effective way of attacking the Chemtrail theory is to point out that it is an unproven theory."
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Chemtrails
If there were nothing else to discredit this resource- and there is plenty- this should do it: it's not an opposing point of view, it's an alternate reality.
- Alaik liked Metapedia
- nicolestubbs8 liked Metapedia
- dimashahbari liked Metapedia
- babsors liked Metapedia
Featured in Lists
A list with 422 apps by AmileyaRyver without a description.
What is Metapedia?
Metapedia information
Developed by
UnknownLicensing
Proprietary and Free product.Rating
Average rating of 3.7Alternatives
8 alternatives listedBadge
Get an embeddable badge for MetapediaSupported Languages
Comments and Reviews
One of the best alternative to Wikipedia
"The chemtrail theory is often attacked by derisively calling it a "conspiracy theory". But because conspiracies do exist, a more effective way of attacking the Chemtrail theory is to point out that it is an unproven theory."
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Chemtrails
If there were nothing else to discredit this resource- and there is plenty- this should do it: it's not an opposing point of view, it's an alternate reality.
One of the strangest websites I've ever visited. It isn't "unbiased", its just obnoxious. There is (and I kid you not) a page debating whether homosexuality is a result of "liberal propaganda".
Incomplete content, poor writing, and unreliable sources. Not a Wikipedia alternative, more akin to a Fandom page.
Great website informing many things that are not in the censored internet.
The more voices, the better.
We need more voices on the left, right, center whatever.
Free speech and open dialogue should be human rights.
This is necessary, as Wikipedia moderators censor any view they find problematic.
More accurate, less CIA infiltration.