

Rocket.Chat
163 likes
Open-source chat server supporting real-time group, direct, and private messaging, video calls, file sharing, helpdesk chat, API integrations, desktop notifications, emojis, LDAP authentication, cross-platform apps, and customizable extensions for teams.
Cost / License
- Freemium (Subscription)
- Open Source (MIT)
Application typeApplication types
Platforms
- Mac
- Windows
- Linux
- Android
- iPhone
- iPad
- Self-Hosted
- Cloudron
Features
Rocket.Chat News & Activities
Highlights All activities
Recent News
No news, maybe you know any news worth sharing?
Share a News TipRecent activities
Fossferous added Rocket.Chat as alternative to Púca- Matt-8179 added Rocket.Chat as alternative to CyberCord
girlbossceo added Rocket.Chat as alternative to Tuwunel- TheZwiss added Rocket.Chat as alternative to Backspace
- bulldogs liked Rocket.Chat
OfficialNvira added Rocket.Chat as alternative to nvira
Zorblock added Rocket.Chat as alternative to Aero P2P Chat- KonstantinStojanovski thinks Ad-free is a important feature of Rocket.Chat
- KonstantinStojanovski thinks Channels is a important feature of Rocket.Chat
- KonstantinStojanovski thinks Team Collaboration is a important feature of Rocket.Chat
Featured in Lists
The ultimate list of apps/services for better Security, Privacy & Anonymity; Defense against Surveillance. What...
List by Sooraj Sathyanarayanan with 199 apps, updated
some privacy services. mostly taken from...
List by Limen with 192 apps, updated
A list with 44 apps by RemovedUser without a description.
List by RemovedUser with 44 apps, updated








Comments and Reviews
The last version is enterprise-ready, and support is pretty much what you pay for, you can also package it with your own theme, and is a fully white-label product
Pretty easy to use. Has native apps. And optional paid features if you are interested but unless you are a business you really dont need the enterprise stuff.
Hosting a rocketchat instance is painful. None of the deployment methods seem to be properly maintained and the documentation is flawed. Software quality seems to have only degraded within the last two years with many important bug tickets and PRs on github ignored for years rendering documented features (e.g. invite links) unusable.
I assume that few people are running a recent version from the 4.5 series; I have no other explanation for the amount of positive reviews here.
Simple to deploy and use, pluggable through its interface with many other online services. Rights are easily managable.
The ability to self host puts you in the drivers seat and makes for a trustworthy platform. Excellent UI!
Easy installation/configuration. Good device-support.
It is great for working in teams and since you can selfhost it makes it more customizable